Aren’t you tired of so-called liberals; the ones that lack the altruism of Dr. King and Joe Lieberman; like every woke crank whose tweets make Trump look like Billy Sunday, or Democrats who deny what they did or said? With the midterms so close, it’s time to expose the worst of the lot with a good old “they out here saying” post.

Biden out here making up “civil rights” history again. On Labor Day, he claimed, “I got very engaged in the civil rights movement. As a kid, I worked a lot in the movement.” It should suffice to cite a New York Times report that Biden lied to voters about having marched in the civil rights movement. In fact, Biden was more Dixiecrat than MLK Democrat.

In 1987, he told reporters, “I was not an activist. I was not out marching; not down in Selma, not anywhere else.” In 2010, he called segregationist senator Robert Byrd a “mentor” and “guide” and “friend” at the former klansman’s funeral. Someone make him stop, because Biden’s 2022 lies include “I came out of the civil rights movement” and “I was arrested during the civil rights movement.”

Hillary Clinton still out here saying whoppers about those dad-gummed emails. On September 6, she tweeted, “I can’t believe we’re still talking about this, but my emails… As Trump’s problems continue to mount, the right is trying to make this about me again. There’s even a ‘Clinton Standard.’ The fact is that I had zero emails that were classified.” After the Whitewater and Lewinsky scandals, the “Clinton standard” is anybody’s guess.

In fact, a DOJ inspector general report confirmed in 2018 that “81 email chains” and “193 individual emails” were marked with security classification levels ranging from “confidential” to “TOP SECRET” at the time of transmission and receipt. Also on Monday, Ms. Clinton told CBS News she won’t run for president again. (Gosh, I wish we could take this woman at her word.)

Democrat councilwoman out here spewing BS because migrants showed up in her “sanctuary city” this summer. After busloads of migrants came into DC, Brianne Nadeau tweeted: “The governors of Texas and Arizona have created this crisis. And the federal government has not stepped up to assist the District of Columbia. Texas and Arizona have turned us into a border town.” Quite a change from her 2019 tweet: “The District is a sanctuary city. Our [police don’t] cooperate with ICE, enforce civil immigration laws, or ask about residency and immigration status. I have called for an abolition of ICE.”

Ms. Nadeau erred on so many levels; the hypocrisy of refusing “sanctuary” to migrants, knowing the “immigration status” of Hispanics, and griping about no “cooperation” from the Federal government. Isn’t exaggerating her migrant problem a microagression against fellow Democrat Rolando Salinas, mayor of Eagle Pass (TX)? Her city of 700,000 received fewer than 10,000 migrants over a 4-month period, while his town of 30,000 took in 10,000 migrants in a single week (source: Fox News). Democrats saying inclusion is better for thee than me is one reason Latinos are saying adios, enimigos!

A Democrat Senate candidate out here saying things so bad, her own party prefers Republican Tim Scott (SC) run un-opposed. Krystle Matthews, a black member of the South Carolina legislature, was filmed by Project Veritas telling associates at a restaurant, “My district is slightly Republican, and it’s heavily white, and let me tell you one thing: you gotta treat them like s***. That’s the only way they’ll respect you. I keep them right here, like under my thumbs, otherwise they get out of control, like kids.”

Not a one-of, because journalists caught her admitting her party had “secret sleepers” run as Republicans (“only way you’re gonna change the dynamics in South Carolina”), telling an inmate that “dope boy money” funds her campaign, and admitting it was her voice on tape (source: AP). After Democrat bigwigs urged her to resign, she lashed out on WCSC: “I said what I said.” Democrats wished she’d said no more…

“I said what I said respectfully, and obviously went off script. In this fight we need everyone’s vote, including the Duffel bag boys. We have to send sleepers to infiltrate the Republican Party and tear their house down. I’ve been doing that effectively as you will see in November.” Really? Because Tim Scott had 66% approval before Matthews’ hate speech (source: Winthrop University).

A woke professor out here saying things about Elizabeth II that her students couldn’t say about George Floyd. As Queen Elizabeth II lay dying, Dr. Uju Anya tweeted, “I heard the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire is finally dying. May her pain be excruciating.” The Carnegie Mellon professor’s tweet was soon blocked for violating Twitter rules, but not before the Twitterverse questioned her decency and humanity.

Lesson learned? No way, because she responded, “I’m not wishing her dead. She’s dying already. I’m wishing her an agonizingly painful death like the one she caused for millions of people.” And, after Buckingham Palace announced the Queen’s death: “If anyone expects me to express anything but disdain for the monarch, you can keep wishing upon a star” – just in case anyone was confused by the first two tweets.

Anya exemplifies the politics of resentment, which is taking identity politics to a very dangerous place. So bad, Carnegie Mellon called her out: “We do not condone the offensive and objectionable messages posted by Uju Anya today on her personal social media account. The views she shared absolutely do not represent the values of the institution.” (But, of course, they won’t “cancel” her.)

Keep these in your come-back quiver. The Democrat mid-term strategy is clearly to shame Republicans into not voting by saying Trump, MAGA, Trump, MAGA, Trump, MAGA like Chinese water torture. Don’t let them (especially family and friends) do it without making them defend Matthews, Nadeau, and Anya. (Nothing like calling “BS” on a liberal during election season.)

By Spencer Morten

The writer is a retired CEO of a US corporation, whose views were informed by studies and work in the US and abroad. An economist by education, and pragmatist by experience, he believes the greatest threat to peace and prosperity are the loudest voices with the least experience and expertise.